How fascinating is it that explicit codes are request in Communications to guide corporate behavior. How is it possible that the core values of an organization do not (appear to) have sufficient impact on the communication behavior of employees? Were those core argentina phone number list values not intend for that purpose?
Resistance to core values
As current digital communication forms become more interactive and visible, core values will automatically appear more often on the agenda. In intranet policy, this has been the case for years with regard to the core values ’open’ and ‘transparent’. There appears to be regular resistance to open and transparent. Does resistance to core values only say something about employees with resistance? Or does this also say something about school email list the product core values and the meaning that is given to core values, or is deriv? Are core values sometimes non- . Think carefully about binding core wishes ?
In many traditional communication policies
A resistance is tackl with even more messages and communication products, in the form of campaigns, brochures they make a positive impact on the local economy websites and mia. In the meantime, Communications sometimes works together with HRM and marketing and we call this internal branding. The message is more consistent and comes from more sides. But this changes very little about the underlying problem in the digitalizing, transparent environment.
