The Global Young Academy (GYA), the InterAcademy
Partnership (IAP) and the International Science Council (ISC) Centre for Science
Futures have released a synthesis paper which sets out the major drivers, opportunities and challenges
for research evaluation reform and collates
illustrative examples of change happening at global, regional, national and institutional levels.
Evaluation practices are
Used to assess research proposals for funding decisions,
research papers for publication, researchers for recruitment or promotion and the
performance of research institutions and universities among other reasons. “A dynamic and
inclusive research system is profoundly important
to attract the best young talent to work towards addressing increasingly urgent global
challenges”, points out Priscilla Kolibea Mante, GYA Co-Chair.
The research system
Is under pressure due to increasing expectations from multiple actors including funders, governments and the publishing industry, tensions between dynamics of competition and cooperation, an evolving scholarly communication system, a sometimes aggressive publishing and data analytics industry, and limited resources. If not managed, these issues can interfere with a just and fruitful assessment of research. The research enterprise must manage these demands and tensions while maintaining research quality, upholding updated 2024 mobile phone number data research integrity, being inclusive and diverse, and safeguarding both basic and applied research.
The GYA,
IAP and ISC Centre for Science how to generate high-quality leads using a floating contact form on your landing page Futures joined forces to take stock of debates and developments in research evaluation worldwide, drawing on a scoping group aqb directory of scientists and a series of regional consultations.
Research incentive and reward systems,
E.g., in Africa tend to reflect “international”, primarily Western, norms and conventions, but they are not always appropriate for local knowledge and needs and tend not to account for research for societal benefit. Moreover, publication models are often not context-sensitive, creating barriers to African research output.
“Thanks to the work of the scoping group, our working paper analyses diverse research cultures and systems, and explores ways in which they might participate in and influence. The reimagining of research evaluation and assessment for the 21st century, in an open and inclusive way,” highlights Peter Gluckman, ISC President.
The global and collective memberships of the GYA,
IAP, and ISC represent a broad cross-section of the research ecosystem whose diverse mandates can facilitate genuine systemic change.
