The relationship between values and behavior is seen in discussions about social media. For example, when it comes to codes of conduct for social media. A current question arising from discussions about such codes of conduct is:
Should codes of conduct relate to
A behavior within and on behalf of an organization? Or:
Should codes of conduct apply to the respective media used by employees within and on behalf of albania phone number list the organization?
In other words, do codes of conduct apply to people in the organization, or are separate codes of conduct needed for the intranet, extranet, blogs, IM, e-mail, Twitter, Yammer, podcasts, YouTube, LinkedIn, Facebook, Hyves, Flickr, Ning, and so on?
This is a rhetorical question. Codes of conduct are of course not the goal. But why then is time and energy invested in codes of conduct for, say, Twitter alone?
Visibility of the virtual pub
Web technology makes our natural, human behavior very visible.
Visible behavior invites control, as can be deduced from the current interest in codes of conduct. This need is focused on the visible output of behavior, such as tweets. All invisible output is disregarded here and therefore plays no role in the control and coding of behavior. But this does not guarantee that things are not communicated outside the field of vision that you as an employer would rather not have. Now school email list suppose that someone in the pub hangs up an (invisible) complaint about his work, or about a customer, and suppose that this then becomes . How do you deal choose your business name and structure visible after all. Would it then be a logical communication decision to draw up a code of conduct for employees in the pub?
